Quick, Low Research Historical Thoughts on "Anne Boleyn" Episode 3

Quick Thoughts on Channel 5’s Anne Boleyn: Episode 1; Episode 2; Episode 3

 It took me forever, but I finally finished watching Channel 5’s Anne Boleyn! I’ve had some rough mental health periods in the last month and frankly it just took me a bit until I was in the right mind to watch an episode about a woman judicially murdered by her husband. (I’m fine, don’t worry – I’ve had clinical depression for a decade and a half now and know how to deal with it. Sidenote: If you have depression and therapy and medicine hasn’t helped you too much, highly recommend the Fisher-Wallace Stimulator! It honestly really changed my life. More in my blog post here).

The final episode of this show closes out with an almost total focus on Anne. This was true in the earlier episodes, but is more obvious here, as Anne is now so isolated and away from everyone else. I actually think it benefits from the close up look at Anne, as Jodie Turner-Smith is frankly the best part of this show by far.

As advertised, this is a brief look and I’m not doing a ton of research, but I did look up a few items in Alison Weir’s “The Lady in the Tower” just to remind myself of some facts (edit: OKAY I may have done a bit more research than originally planned. This still was relatively low research for me). It’s a good read when it comes to Anne’s last days at least, although it’s good to keep in mind that Weir has some of the same anti-Anne bias as most other historians. For a balanced view at the historiography around Anne, I highly suggest The Creation of Anne Boleyn by Susan Bordo.

This episode takes place over the last 2.5 weeks of Anne Boleyn’s life. Anne was sent to the Tower on May 2, 1536 and was executed on May 19, 1536.

anne boleyn scaffold 2.jpg

Credit: Anne Boleyn, Channel 5

  1. Anne is taken quietly to the Tower of London, at what looks like dusk. In real life, she was taken there in the late afternoon, and the news of her arrest had spread enough that there were large crowd on the riverbanks watching her arrive there. They also set off a cannon when she arrived.
    At the Tower, she meets the constable of the tower and is taken to her chambers without much conversation. In real life, she met the constable’s deputy, not Kingston himself. In addition, some records indicate that Anne may have suffered a bit of a nervous breakdown upon her arrival at the Tower (as ANYONE would, honestly), and fell down on her knees to pray. When the councillors left her at the tower, she spoke to them and asked if they would beseech the king to be good to her. 

  2. In the show, Anne’s rooms in the Tower of London are small and rather simple, though well furnished and certainly nicer than any prison we’d think of today. In reality, Anne was imprisoned in the same Queen’s apartment that had been built for her coronation only a few years prior. These were very large apartments. The Queen’s great watching chamber alone was 70 foot by 30 foot! The apartments also had a presence chamber, a privy chamber, a closet/oratory, a bedchamber, and another large chamber which may have served as a dining room. The rooms in the episode have bars on the windows; I’m honestly not sure if Anne’s room had barred windows or not in real life.  Yes, it was a really fancy, newly refurbished royal apartment, but at the same time, the Tower of London was a fortress and a prison. So it’s hard to tell.

  3. As Anne enters her cell, she states, ainsi sera, groigne qui groigne’, ‘grumble all you like, this is how it’s going to be.” This is…an odd choice.
    Anne adopted this defiant statement as her motto in 1530, when people were highly anti-Anne and pro-Catherine of Aragon, and had it embroidered on her servants’ livery coats at the time. However, the new liveries and the new motto were laid aside in only a few weeks. The Spanish version of the story (courtesy of gossip monger Eustace Chapuys) has it that that Anne chose the motto because she had heard it in France and stopped using it once she realized it was actually an imperialist Burgundian motto, but since Anne spent several years abroad in the court of Margaret of Austria and in France, it seems odd that she would not have known this initially. I think it’s more likely that she realized the defiant motto was just causing more tension and was more trouble than it’s worth.
    So contextually, it just…doesn’t quite make sense in this scene? Perhaps they were intending to say something along the lines of “que sera sera” (whatever will be will be).

  4. Anne’s red dress at the start of the episode may have two different meanings. This could refer both to her scandalous reputation and also to her post-death reinvention as a Christian martyr in the reign of Elizabeth I (the color red traditionally represents martyrs in protestant faiths).

  5. Lady Anne Shelton is told to keep a full report on everything Anne does. Constable of the Tower William Kingston’s letters identify five women that were with Anne during her imprisonment: his own wife Mary Scrope, Margaret Dymoke Coffin (married to the Queen’s Master of the House) the Queen’s aunt Anne Shelton, and another of Anne’s aunts, Elizabeth Boleyn. Anne had two domestic servants, two menservants, and a boy to serve her as well.
    Some records indicate that those serving Anne were all forbidden to speak with her unless Lady Kingston was present, indicating that she was really the ringleader reporting back to the Constable and Cromwell, not Lady Shelton, as shown in this show.
    In one of her letters from the Tower, Anne stated that it was unkind for the king to put women about her that she never loved and she would have preferred ladies of her own privy chamber. It’s unclear whether it was some of these women or others that actually went with Anne to the scaffold for her execution. Madge Shelton shows up later in the episode and is with Anne at the time of her death, but there’s no actual indication that she was there in real life. There were some women with her at the scaffold that Anne seemed to actually care for, but we don’t know their actual identities.

  6. Throughout the episode, Anne’s first priority is her daughter Elizabeth. She dreams about her daughter crying, she asks whether Elizabeth is safe multiple times, refuses to eat until she knows that her daughter is well (I don’t think there’s any evidence that Anne actually did this, by the way), and worries about her daughter’s birthright if she signs the annulment papers. As I said in an earlier blog post, this lines up with actual records – Anne truly was a very doting mother by Tudor standards. This also aligns with Jodie Turner-Smith’s statements in interviews in which she said she identified with Anne as a mother.
    Anne is told that Elizabeth was taken back to Hatfield, where Elizabeth spent some of her early childhood. Elizabeth was moved between several palaces throughout her life, however, as the royal households never really stayed put very long in Tudor times.

  7. Anne is seen reading the Bible and praying. She specifically reads: “For thou art my defender and helper, and has preserved my body from destruction, and from the snare of the slanderous tongue, and from the lips that forge lies, and has been mine helper against mine adversaries:” Ecclesiasticus 51:2. (i know it sounds like Ecclesiastes, but it’s different).

  8. In the show, the Constable tries to dine with her and Anne refuses to eat. She asks him to tell Cromwell that she won’t touch food until she has news of Elizabeth.
    In real life, we know from Kingston’s letters to Cromwell that Anne did take her meals with Kingston regularly, and apparently made a very good impression on him. Much of what we know about Anne’s last days come from these letters. His letters revealed that Anne asked for holy communion, worried over the men who had been arrested with her, became agitated over the possibilities of their deaths and her own (even from early on in her imprisonment), and also worried a great deal about the effect her arrest was having on her mother. She also repeatedly told the constable that she was innocent and that there was no reason she should not be able to take the sacrament. There apparently were…some muttered ramblings as well, honestly, because of stress and fear. This does show up a bit later in the show, when she starts muttering about dead man’s shoes and wanting to see Henry.
    Thus, overall, she talked a lot more and was much less …stoic than she is portrayed in the show. I love that she’s shown with so much dignity in the show, but historically, she was much less composed. She was completely terrified, and it showed in her conversations with others, which were rather manic at times.

  9. We see Anne starting to write a letter and than pause when she hears someone come in. We do have a letter that supposedly was written by Anne Boleyn to Henry while she was in the tower, but its authenticity is questioned. You can read more about that letter here.

  10. In Anne’s conversation with Cromwell, he reveals that five men were arrested along with her. The men arrested for adultery with Anne were Sir Henry Norris, Sir William Brereton, Sir Francis Weston, Mark Smeaton, and Anne’s own brother George Boleyn, Lord Rochford. The show doesn’t mention this, but two other men – Sir Thomas Wyatt and Sir Richard Page – were also accused of adultery with Anne but were later released.
    Anne straight up suggests that Cromwell tortured Mark Smeaton to get his confession. This really did happen. Records indicate that Smeaton was the only one who was tortured.

  11. In her meeting with Cromwell, Anne ends up losing her temper at Cromwell (as frankly, anyone would). Kingston grabs her and pins her down to restrain her and calm her down. I have never heard of this happening and do not think it at all possible. Everything I’ve read indicates that Kingston actually came to regard Anne Boleyn with respect and would not have grabbed her or restrained her physically.

  12. In the show, Madge Shelton came to the tower to be with Anne and comfort her friend. I so wish this were true and that Anne had a close friend with her in her last days, but I don’t believe it is. There are lots of traditions that a few of her friends were with her on the scaffold, but we don’t have any evidence as to their identities beyond “four young ladies” (more on that later!).

  13. When Kingston tells Anne her trial date, Madge instantly suggests they prepare. Anne correctly notes that she cannot have counsel in a trial for treason. In accordance with legal practice of the time, Anne also was not allowed to question any of the witnesses, summon witnesses to speak for her, or give evidence on her own behalf.  [On several occasions I’ve thought about making a blog post about various Tudor incidents that demonstrate the essential lack of human rights that we now have in most countries in modern times, and this would be pretty high on the list]
    Madge suggests they prepare for the trial, but Anne says no and that God will guide her speech when the time comes. Thus, this show again highlights Anne’s faith.

  14. At one point, Anne slices a pomegranate in half. Catherine of Aragon’s badge included the pomegranate. This perhaps is a symbol of how Anne supplanted Catherine of Aragon, alluding to the current situation where Anne is supplanted by Jane Seymour. Red juice runs down Anne’s hand in a clear reference to blood.

  15. Timeline Note: Most of the accused men were tried on May 12. All of them pled not guilty but Mark Smeaton. The jury pronounced them all guilty and sentenced them to be drawn, hung, and quartered. The finding of their guilt pretty much sealed Anne’s fate; Henry VIII seemed to agree and actually ordered her household to be broken up and dissolved on May 13. Anne and her brother George were tried on May 15, due to their status as nobles. All the men were executed on May 17 and Anne was executed on May 19.

  16. Madge helps Anne put on a black dress and hood for the trial. In real life, Anne wore a black velvet gown over a petticoat (like an underskirt) of scarlet damask, with a small cap that had a black and white feather. She was attended at the trial by a few of the ladies staying with her in the trial (and perhaps a few maids of honor from her household, but we don’t know for sure).

  17. Anne’s uncle, the Duke of Norfolk, really did preside over Anne’s and George’s trial in his role as Lord High Steward. The jury was made up of 26 peers of various ranks (of the 62 peers in the land). The jury may have actually included Anne’s father, the Earl of Wiltshire, but the records on that are pretty unclear (some people said he was there as a judge, but his name wasn’t on the official record).

    In the show, the trial appears to take place in a hall with spectators, but not an overly large one. In real life, they held the trial in the King’s Hall in The Tower of London, which was 80 feet by 50 feet. They actually built platforms and put in benches to accommodate the many spectators they expected to come watch the trial. Ambassador Eustace Chapuys claimed there were 2,000 spectators at the trial.

    In the episode, Anne stands during the trial. Common prisoners really did stand up to hear their charges read at Tudor trials, but since Anne was the Queen of England, she was given a chair to sit in for the whole time.

  18. Cromwell gives a few particular dates of alleged acts of adultery and incest. The historical trial was based on indictments handed down by two grand juries, one based in Middlesex (intended to address “unlawful acts” that had taken place in Middlesex, at Hampton Court Palace and at Whitehall) and one in Kent (intended to cover unlawful acts that had taken place in Kent, namely, at Greenwich Palace, East Greenwich, and Eltham Palace).  Some of the dates align with those in one or both of the indictments; some do not.
    Anne defends herself against one charge by noting that she was not in the place stated at that time, as she was in Greenwich recovering from the birth of Elizabeth.

    The gross line about Anne and George having their tongues in each other’s mouths is almost verbatim from the Middlesex Indictment.

  19. The charges and evidence against Anne Boleyn were honestly ludicrous and the vast majority of them are easily disproven by records. And people even knew that at the time! Imperial Ambassador Eustace Chapuys hated Anne with the fire of a thousand suns, but even he said that there was no valid proof or confession against her.
    As Alison Weir said in The Lady in The Tower, “Close scrutiny of the facts suggests that thirteen out of the twenty-one charges were impossible, and that if, four and a half centuries later it can be established that only eight were even plausible—which in itself suggests that even these were not genuine offenses—then the case against Anne is shaky indeed. Furthermore, allegations that a number of unspecified offenses had been committed ‘on diverse days before and after’ the stated dates on which the crimes had purportedly been committed would be difficult to disprove, and Cromwell was doubtless aware of this; it was a catchall guarantee…In no fewer than twelve instances, either Anne or her alleged accomplice can be shown not to have been in the specified location.”
    Weir also pointed out that on all but one of the dates cited, Anne was pregnant. At the time, sex during pregnancy was super scandalous. People believed sex while pregnant threatened the health of the unborn child.  
    Some of the alleged dates of adultery also occurred very soon after Anne gave birth; she likely was not physically up for sex at that time, and would still have been secluded with her ladies. There was also a very strong taboo against having sex after a woman gave birth but before she was churched.

  20. It appears that detailed records of the trial were taken at the time, but those records were lost or destroyed. We don’t have actual trial records, witness statements, or interrogation statements. The show’s portrayal of Anne being very dignified and composed during the trial is accurate. Records indicate that she defended herself very well, with clear logic.

    Lady Rochford and the Countess of Worcester testify against Anne at the trial in the episode. It’s a little unclear whether there were live witnesses at the trial in real life. Ambassador Chapuys claimed there were no witnesses against her, even though that was standard practice. Statements may have been read instead.

  21. It’s been accepted for a long time that Jane Parker, Lady Rochford (George Boleyn’s wife) was a witness against Anne Boleyn, but I don’t believe we have any contemporary evidence proving this. The records stating that she testified against him dated from years later (although they were based on extensive research and witness testimonies, so they can’t be completely dismissed either).
    The evidence against Anne regarding George is super paltry. It was pretty fashionable at the time to kiss women on the mouth as a greeting; this wasn’t unusual.
    We don’t know exactly what Elizabeth Browne, Lady Worcester, said about Anne, but various letters do seem to indicate that she did give evidence against her. Honestly, there are a lot of letters back and forth referring to Lady Worcester and it seems like perhaps she just said something false about Anne’s morality just to distract attention from her own behavior (her brother was chiding her at the time) and it may have just gotten…really really out of control.

  22. I don’t believe we actually know exactly what Anne said at the trial, but people reported that she spoke very well and defended herself with logic and dignity. She likely did not make any comments about her own personal ambition, as that is much more of a modern feminist spin, but the line about being loyal and faithful to her husband and God being her judge sounds much more accurate.

  23. In the show, the verdict is determined and given to the Duke of Norfolk in a piece of paper. I believe in real life, each juror had to individually give their verdict out loud. Every peer sitting in judgment of her gave their verdict as guilty, probably out of intense fear of the king.
    I definitely thought the bit where Norfolk said her crown and titles were removed forthwith was made up, but actually, it’s more true than I realized! Records indicated that Anne was asked to resign her crown; she likely wasn’t wearing it at the time, but it may have been placed ceremonially nearby for this purpose. Anne resigned the crown, and then agreed to the removal of all her titles.

  24. In real life, apparently the Duke of Norfolk actually did cry when he read the death sentence for his niece Anne, although it’s unclear whether this was due to grief for her or his family or shame (they had been on bad terms for months before the trial).

  25. Various records indicate that Anne may have spoken after her sentence was given. There are different accounts, but the gist is that she was ready to die personally but was saddened that the innocent men accused with her would also die. She also stated that she suspected there were other reasons she had been convicted, as she had always been faithful to the king.
    They didn’t show anything of George’s trial in the show, but in real life, he was tried immediately after Anne, in the same room. 

  26. Cranmer did go to see Anne in the tower in order to get her consent to dissolve the marriage. We know from Kingston’s letters to Cromwell that after her meeting with Cranmer, Anne said she might be able to go to a nunnery and that she was in “hope of life.”
    In the show, Cranmer says god could not accept her into paradise if she chose death – oh ffs. I don’t think that’s how that works in the theology of the time! I would need to consult with a pastor to know for sure though.
    Cranmer was actually a really amazing guy and extremely forward thinking for his time; there are letters indicating that he really did not believe Anne was guilty and may have at least thought about begging Henry to have mercy on her, even if he didn’t actually quite get all the way there. I don’t love this portrayal of him, as his character seems to believe Anne is guilty, based on some of his comments about hell.

  27. In the show, Kingston brings Anne out to have one last look at her brother before George is executed. This is sweet. I doubt it happened though. We’d never have any knowledge of it. People in the tower did occasionally get to see their loved ones with bribes and such.

  28. All five of the men accused of sleeping with Anne had their sentences of being drawn, hung, and quartered commuted to beheading by the axe by Henry. It was pretty notable that he did this even for Mark Smeaton, a lowly musician. But like, he doesn’t get brownie points for killing these people in a slightly less gruesome way.

    In the show, it’s noted that it took 3 strokes of the axe to kill George Boleyn. Unfortunately this is true. Executioners of the Tudor era were not known for being particularly skillful or fast in decapitating the condemned. This is one reason why it was considered merciful for Henry to send for the executioner of Calais, a famous sword executioner, to kill Anne Boleyn (note: he did not do this for his fifth wife, Catherine Howard, who was executed by the axe).
    This is all from Anne’s POV, so we don’t see any of the actual executions of the men condemned with her. In real life, they were all executed one after another, in front of each other. The order went – George Boleyn, Lord Rochford; Henry Norris; Sir Francis Weston; William Brereton; and finally Mark Smeaton. It must have been terrifically bloody and terrible, particularly for those that had to watch their fellows die in front of them.

  29. I sincerely doubt that Anne told off Cromwell as magnificently as she did in the show, but wouldn’t it be nice? My favorite line: “When people speak your name they will think of mine and the lengths you went to sully it. You will never be rid of me.” That’s arguably true! Although we’ll never know exactly who orchestrated Anne’s downfall (and I personally think some of the false evidence is too sloppy for Cromwell to have made up himself, when his other work shows a meticulous attention to detail), Cromwell has always been the chief suspect, and played a huge role regardless.

  30. The show leaves out one of the real life horrors of Anne’s execution, namely, how her execution was actually delayed several times. Anne was all ready to die at 9 am on May 18. She had been praying for several hours before the scheduled time and took mass from Archbishop Cranmer at that time. At the time, she swore on the sacrament in front of Cranmer and Kingston that she had not been unfaithful to the king. [This is really compelling evidence of Anne’s innocence actually; people very seriously believed in God, heaven, and hell at the time, and Anne knew she was about to die. Lying, while swearing on the Sacrament, right before her death could danger her immortal soul, and Anne really wouldn’t have done that.]
    When 9 am came and went, she asked Kingston whether she would be executed at noon; he deflected and did not tell her. After noon had passed, Kingston told her that her execution was delayed for a day. She would not be executed until around 8 am on March 19.

  31. In the show, Anne asks her ladies to give her prayer book to her daughter Elizabeth, and wrote a little bit in it to her. Anne did have a prayer book that she wrote in, and may have brought to her execution. What she actually wrote in it was her signature and ‘Remember me when you do pray that hope doth lead from day to day. It’s unclear exactly what happened to the prayer book after Anne’s execution, but it likely did not go to Elizabeth, as Henry VIII went on a “destroy everything that ever belonged to Anne” rampage and likely wouldn’t have allowed his daughter to keep anything of hers.
    Some amazing new discoveries involving Anne’s prayer book have recently come to light and if you're not familiar with them, I highly suggest you go read about them over here!

  32. In the show, Anne is accompanied to the scaffold by Madge Shelton and her mother Lady Shelton. In real life, eyewitness accounts say that Anne was attended by “four young ladies.” We do not know their identities, but this pretty conclusively rules out Lady Shelton and most of the other older women that were with her in the tower. Madge might have been one of them but there’s no evidence for it. It’s possible that Margaret Wyatt (sister of the poet Thomas Wyatt, who was arrested and then released) may have been there; there’s a tradition that Anne actually gave her a prayer book, but this is likely a rumor and not accurate. There are also stories that Anne’s niece Katherine Carey may have attended her, but a twelve year old child would almost certainly be considered far too young to serve Anne in the tower and on the scaffold.

    Both in the show and the real life, the executioner did actually ask Anne for forgiveness and she gave it to him “willingly,” not quite “with all my heart” as in the show.

  33. I will literally never forgive this series for not letting Jodie Turner-Smith give Anne Boleyn’s scaffold speech. Sure, we don’t know for SURE what Anne said, but we have a pretty good idea based on people’s various recollections. And Jodie would have KILLED  that speech. Fun fact: Jodie Turner-Smith agreed! I tweeted about this and she responded “me too,” which just about made my life.

  34. The epilogue mentions that Anne’s daughter Elizabeth had a locket ring with pictures of Elizabeth and Anne Boleyn. This refers to the Chequers Locket Ring and is….sort of true. The second portrait isn’t conclusively identified as Anne Boleyn, but like, probably.

  35. The epilogue again is presented over a banner with Anne’s heraldic badge of a falcon on it and the stupid ainsi sera, groigne qui groigne slogan that she only used for a very brief time several years before her execution, but okay, fine. It’s a cool theme to come back to, and we know that she was attached to the slogan at one point.
    I’m pretty positive this is an invented banner, as I couldn’t find anything like it when I did a quick google search. Let me know if you know differently.

Tudor Watch Party 1: The Other Boleyn Girl

I’ve started doing an online Tudor Watch Party! I plan to do these once a month or so and host a virtual discussion for about a week.

Here’s everything I wrote about the first selection for it, The Other Boleyn Girl.

other boleyn girl tudor watch party.png

This 2008 film starring Natalie Portman and Scarlet Johansson brought Philippa Gregory's novel to the big screen and was part of a revival of interest in Tudor stories at the time (as also indicated by the TV show The Tudors, which ran from 2007-2010).The Other Boleyn Girl tells the familiar story of Anne Boleyn and Henry VIII's "Great Matter" through the eyes of her sister Mary Boleyn, spinning historical rumor about Mary and Henry into a scandalous, sexy story.

The #1 New York Times bestselling novel the film is based on was the first book Philippa Gregory wrote about the Tudors/Plantagenets. Gregory has now written 15 of them, which have been turned into at least four separate TV series (a TV version of The Other Boleyn Girl, The White Queen [which actually combined three of her novels]), The White Princess, and The Spanish Princess [based off of The Constant Princess]).

Warning: A lot of this film is based on historical rumor instead of fact and a ton of it is fictionalized. But that should give us a ton to talk about!

The Other Boleyn Girl is up on Amazon Prime to rent for $2.99. I'll try to pick selections that are free to stream every other week so this doesn't get too expensive for anyone, promise!

Various notes from my watch of The Other Boleyn Girl:

  • So it’s actually been YEARS since I’ve watched this film. I would guess probably at least 6. I know much much more about Tudor history and Anne Boleyn in particular than I did upon watching it for the first time. This film and the book it is based upon is /not/ meant to be a historical documentary, so I won’t go into every little thing they get wrong, but I’ll try to talk through the big things I notice as I watch through.

  • The film portrays Anne as the eldest child, but historically, it’s a bit more iffy. We don’t even know the exact year Anne was born, and she was by far more well known than her sister. Most historians seem to believe that Mary was the eldest child, as she was indeed married first, and her descendants later acted as if she was the eldest by claiming their titles based on that ranking. In addition, when Anne was created a Marchioness in 1532, she was referred to as one of the daughters of Thomas Boleyn; if she was the eldest, that probably would have been explicitly stated.

  • The film portrays Anne as being present at Mary’s wedding to William Carey and being sent off to France as a punishment later, for her relationship with Henry Percy, and then only for a few months. In reality, Anne was sent to Europe at a much younger age, such treatment was an honor and not a punishment, and she wasn’t even in the country at the time of Mary’s wedding in 1520. Anne was actually sent off to Europe in 1513, where she served in the court of Margaret of Austria in the Netherlands. She was transferred to France in 1514 to attend Henry VIII’s sister Mary, who married Louis XII. Louis died only a few months into his new marriage, and then Anne moved to serve Queen Claude. She stayed in France until 1522.

  • Costuming Note: Anne is very often shown in shades of green, as a nod to the historical myth that Henry VIII wrote Greensleeves for her. This isn’t accurate at all, as we know that Greensleeves was based off of a romanesca, an Italian style of musical composition that did not reach England until after Henry VIII's death.
    From what I can tell as someone who’s researched Tudor fashion a lot at this point but is admittedly still an amateur on the subject, the film is pretty accurate at least in the shapes and styles shown. Its characters are generally shown wearing some sort of head covering (as opposed to “The White Queen,” where no one ever wears a hat) and those head coverings look pretty realistic, as opposed to the much more fanciful headwear sometimes sported by Anne Boleyn in the TV show “The Tudors.”

  • Possible Costuming Quibble: Men are shown sporting very heavy, wide coats that make them look rather boxy. Henry VIII IS known for making this fashionable, but I was under the impression that this fashion developed later in his reign, when he had put on weight and was no longer the trim young handsome man. Don’t get me wrong, there were still a lot of layers and bulk, but I didn’t think men’s fashion had gotten /quite/ this wide yet.

  • Costuming Note: It’s accurate that some women would be wearing the gable hood (as seen in Queen Katherine’s court) and some would be wearing a French hood (as seen worn by Mary and Anne). The French hood was likely brought to the Tudor court by Mary Tudor around 1516 ish, but the gable hood remained pretty popular until the 1530s or so. The French hood did become very strongly associated with Anne Boleyn, but she by no mean originated the fashion in England.

  • We don’t really know how much Thomas Boleyn (Anne and Mary’s father) and Thomas Howard (their uncle) were involved in pushing Mary into the king’s arms, and later, Anne. This is a very commonly portrayed dynamic, but no one really knows. The film portrays her father and uncle asking Mary very bluntly about her sex life with the King (and in front of her husband, mother, and brother too), which like, ick and ick forever, but again, we really don’t know

  • Mary Boleyn also went to France in 1514 to serve Princess Mary as she married Louis XII of france. She stayed on in France and served Queen Claude along with her sister until 1519. She began serving Catherine of Aragon then, even before her marriage.
    Although her affairs were likely exaggerated, the French king did refer to her as a very great whore and the English Mare, so Mary may have been involved with the king himself. We do know that she slept with Henry VIII though, as it was based on this relationship that Henry’s marriage to Anne was later annulled. When Henry was trying to get the pope to annul his marriage to Catherine, he also requested dispensation to marry Anne, the sister of his former mistress. In any case, the choice to portray Mary as super shy is an interesting one.

  • It was rumored at the time that at least one of Mary’s children was the King’s, but there’s no evidence supporting this. Henry did not acknowledge them as his, as he did Henry Fitzroy, but then, Mary DID have a husband (while Henry Fitzroy’s mother, Elizabeth Blount, did not).

  • It’s shown in the film that Mary found out about Anne’s marriage to Henry Percy, told her father and uncle about it, then they put a stop to it. Historically, Anne was only betrothed to Henry Percy, but this betrothal was broken off when Percy’s father refused to allow it. There’s no evidence that they actually had sex (as happened in this film). Cardinal Wolsey, who was basically running England for Henry VIII at this point, helped put a stop to the match as well, which likely earned him Anne’s enmity for the rest of her life.

  • Other Tudor Pop Culture Note: Interestingly enough, this film doesn’t portray Cardinal Wolsey at all. He's mentioned like, once, as a courtier says Wolsey will draw up plans to send Catherine of Aragon to a nunnery, but we never see him. That’s really weird, given how much of a role Wolsey played in Anne Boleyn’s life. He generally shows up in any pop culture set during Henry VIII’s early reign, including The Tudors and Shakespeare’s Henry VIII.

    Lady Elizabeth Boleyn does appear in this film and plays a pretty big role. I’m pretty sure she never shows up in the Tudors, or if she does, it’s very tiny, as I’ve watched that TV show several times now and don’t remember her at all.

  • Back to History: The film portrays Thomas Boleyn being made an earl because of Mary’s becoming pregnant with her first child, but in reality, he wasn’t elevated to the peerage until 1525, when Henry VIII was pursuing Anne, and at the time, he was only made a Viscount. He was made an Earl in 1529 and George Boleyn was only then given the title of viscount. Mary’s first child, Catherine, was born in 1524. Her second child Henry was born in 1526.

  • The marriage of George Boleyn and Jane Parker is very commonly portrayed as an unhappy one, but there’s really no contemporary evidence supporting that. She was believed for a long time to have had a role in the downfall of her husband and Anne Boleyn, but again, there’s no indication that it was actually the case.

Natalie Portman and Eric Bana in The Other Boleyn Girl

  • In the film, the plotting Thomases say that the king will no longer bed Mary now that she’s lying in, so they need Anne to come in to get his attention. First, they generally called the time before the baby was born confinement, rather than lying in. Second, many people in Tudor times believed that any sex during pregnancy could be dangerous for the baby, so in reality, Henry probably stopped “bedding” any of his wives or mistresses the moment they knew they were pregnant. The film also mentions that Henry visits Mary during her lying in, and shows George visiting her as well. During a queen's pregnancy, anyway, no men would be allowed into her rooms during the confinement. I'm not sure if the same rules would be applied to a royal mistress. The rooms were very dark though, as George observes in the film, as it was practice to draw all the curtains and block out the sun during a queen's confinement (I actually have no idea if this was the practice for other, non-queen noble women as well).

  • Anne talks about “the queen” she served in Europe providing her ladies a broad education and introducing her to scholars and philosophers. Henry refers to them as Lutherans and heretics. The plotting thomases refer to the queen as “the dowager queen.”

  • It seems that they’re conflating the French court of Queen Claude (a very catholic woman who was NOT a widow at the time and thus wouldn’t have been called a dowager) with the court of Margaret of Austria, in the Netherlands (remember, Anne Boleyn served them both). Claude was pregnant almost her entire marriage and had a strict moral code for everyone in her household.

  • Margaret, a widow, served as governor of the Habsburg Netherlands from 1507-1530. She had a famously large library, was patron to numerous artists and musicians and also had several humanists visit her court. Erasmus was a humanist and a progressive who believed the Roman Catholic church needed to be reformed, but he was also definitely a traditional Catholic who believed in transubstantiation, and disagreed quite openly with Martin Luther and other big name Protestants. She also was a patron of Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa, who was a theologian with some controversial ideas and interest in the occult, but also …was definitively Catholic, albeit one who criticized abuses of the catholic church and sympathized with Martin Luther. I really can’t pin down what the script is referencing here.

  • With more research…maybe they’re referring to Marguerite de Navarre? It’s possible that Anne served Marguerite rather than Claude, as their courts may have overlapped, but it’s not fully known. We do have a letter from Anne (post being made queen) where she said some very nice, affectionate things about Marguerite, so it’s possible. Marguerite was a princess of France and Queen of Navarre (whose husband in 1525, so...conceivably she could be referred to as a dowager queen). Marguerite was also a huge patron of the arts and DID indeed serve as a mediator between Roman Catholics and Protestants. She advocated for reforming the church but was not actually a reformer herself.

  • So okay, I think the film is referring to Marguerite de Navarre, just…in a very weird round about way, as I don’t think they ever refer to Navarre rather than France. Navarre is not in France, but is in Spain, although it is on the border, so if they're trying to refer to Marguerite, they're not doing it very accurately or clearly.

  • I am actually really enjoying how many British actors who later became known for other things show up in here. Benedict Cumberbatch plays Mary’s husband William Carey, who appears for maybe half an hour and then disappears. Eddie Redmayne plays Mary’s second husband, William Stafford, and pops in every once in a while. Alfie Allen (Theon in Game of Thrones) shows up just as a messenger trying to deliver a gift to Anne from the queen.

  • Wow, Anne really is a bitch to her sister in this film. The bit where she actually secures Henry’s promise to never bed his wife again and never speak to Mary again in exchange for her someday maybe being his lover, RIGHT after Mary has given birth, so Henry literally walks away from Mary and his son with her without talking to her at all? GOOD LORD. (to be fair, it was Henry’s idea, not hers)

  • Historical note: Mary’s first child was a daughter, not a son.

  • Is it weird that in this film about a quintessentially English story, the main three actors aren’t English? Natalie Portman is a citizen of both Israel and the US, Scarlet Johansson is American, and Eric Bana is Australian. I bet people were pretty pissed about that at the time. Most of the secondary actors are English though: Jim Sturgess (George Boleyn), Kristen Scott Thomas (Elizabeth Boleyn), Mark Rylance (Thomas Boleyn – and also, he famously played Thomas Cromwell in Wolf Hall), David Mark Morrissey (Thomas Howard), Benedict Cumberbatch (William Carey), Oliver Coleman (Henry Percy), Juno Temple (Jane Parker), and Eddie Redmayne (William Stafford).

  • Catherine of Aragon is played by Ana Torrent, a Spanish actress. She’s also portrayed as a brunette woman with a heavy Spanish accent. Historically, Catherine of Aragon was known to have auburn hair and after 15+ years in England, probably wouldn’t have that deep of an accent.

  • Okay seriously, WHAT HAPPENED to Mary’s husband William Carey in the film? He’s just sent away by the king one day on a mysterious assignment and literally never mentioned again. In real life, he died in 1527 (several years after the king began pursuing Anne Boleyn and 5 years after Mary had their first child) of the sweating sickness. What a weird thing to just drop and never talk about at all.

  • What the heck is the timeline in this film anyway? It’s natural that it would be compressed, as in real life, Henry VIII pursued Anne Boleyn starting in 1525, the trial at Blackfriars of Henry’s marriage to Catherine of Aragon didn’t occur until May 1529, and they weren’t able to get married until late 1532-early 1533. Their story lasted a really long time and it makes sense that everyone speeds through it. But they’ve flipped several events and changed things enough that it’s hard to tell exactly what happens when.

  • Queen Catherine of Aragon, a Spanish princess and daughter of Isabella and Ferdinand, would probably not stoop so low as to talk directly to Anne and Mary Boleyn and call them whores for sleeping with her husband. I don’t think we have any evidence of her directly confronting any of her husband’s mistresses.

  • I will say, I haven’t actually read the novel this is based on, so I don’t actually know how much it differs from the original Philippa Gregory story. I AM currently marathoning through the Gregory Plantagent/Tudor books though, albeit slowly, as I read other books too, and am currently on The White Princess, so TOBG will be in two more books.

  • Catherine of Aragon’s speech before Henry VIII at the Legatine court on her knees is almost word for word exactly what she said historically. It’s been heavily edited, as she said significantly more than that. However, the part at the end where she directly says the pope must rule on their marriage? That was not in her original speech, although she did insinuate that that was what she wanted. Some of what she actually said that points to that desire:

    • “Sir, I beseech you for all the loves that hath been between us, and for the love of God, let me have justice and right, take of me some pity and compassion, for I am a poor woman and a stranger born out of your dominion, I have here no assured friend, and much less indifferent counsel: … Therefore is it a wonder tome what new inventions are now invented against me, that never intended but honesty. And cause me to stand to the order and judgment of this new court, wherein ye may do me much wrong, if ye intend any cruelty; for ye may condemn me for lack of sufficient answer, having no indifferent counsel, but such as be assigned me, with whose wisdom and learning I am not acquainted. Ye must consider that they cannot be indifferent counsellors for my part which be your subjects, and taken out of your own council before, wherein they be made privy, and dare not, for your displeasure, disobey your will and intent, being once made privy thereto. Therefore, I most humbly require you, in the way of charity, and for the love of God, who is the just judge, to spare the extremity of this new court, until I may be advertised what way and order my friends in Spain will advise me to take. And if ye will not extend to me so much indifferent favour, your pleasure then be fulfilled, and to God I commit my case!”

  • Okay so the insertion of Henry raping Anne into the film is really upsetting and insanely unnecessary and there’s no historical proof for it. I had forgotten that was in there and UGH. Is that in the original Gregory novel? God I hope not.

  • Henry and Anne’s wedding was a hell of a lot more private than it’s shown to be in the film. Think like, five people, not like the 50 shown in the film. There were actually probably two secret wedding ceremonies, both very small.

  • There’s no evidence of public boos of Anne at or around her coronation. Sure, people hated her (I mean, a mob tried to storm the house she was eating dinner in and kill her once), but that’s a little…public, to be booing the new queen. Although Henry wouldn’t really start beheading people for their views on Anne until a few years later, when people refused to sign and swear their allegiance to the parliamentary Act of Succession (which named Anne Boleyn the legitimate Queen of England and also made the king the head of the church of England), everyone knew he had the power to make it happen.

  • Anne wasn’t really called a witch during her lifetime. Honestly, if she was suspected to be a witch, we would have a lot more documentary evidence saying so. I mean. People called her everything else, why not that?

  • Pulling from an earlier blog post of mine: “However, in later years, various people spread the rumor. One Catholic writer Nicholas Sander described Anne Boleyn as having six fingers on her right hand and having a projecting tooth (but he said this in 1585, so like - how would he know?). He also alleged that she miscarried a monstrously deformed child. None of Anne’s contemporaries actually mention her having an extra finger, projecting tooth, or deformed child- and considering how much they hated her, wouldn’t they have mentioned it at the time if she did?” (excerpted from - https://www.rachaeldickzen.com/blog/2020/6/25/dontloseyourhead)

  • The portrayal of Anne sort of slowly slipping into more paranoia and hysteria about her relationship with Henry is pretty real. Anne had a notoriously sharp tongue and sudden temper. She and Henry really did have a stormy relationship. Another excerpt from my blog: “Reports from the time indicated that Anne and Henry had a very stormy relationship and had a tendency to have huge arguments and then later would reunite blissfully. One report described their relationship as “storm followed sunshine, sunshine followed storm.”

  • As I said earlier, there’s really no evidence that Jane Parker plotted with Thomas Cromwell to bring about Anne Boleyn and George Boleyn’s downfall, as the film portrays.

  • There’s of course also the plot device where Anne asks George to have sex with her to impregnate her and get her with child, in order to save her life. This is of course, absolutely did not happen. And even in the film, they don’t go through with it.

  • The way Anne is arrested and taken to the tower of London in the film is FAR more dramatic than it was in real life. They show her arguing with the king and him demanding his guards take her away. Historically, the last time Anne saw Henry was like, at a jousting tournament. He just left. And then all the other people she was accused with sleeping of were arrested slowly one at a time, and then they came for her. TOBG doesn’t even show the other people Anne was accused of adultery with, just her brother.

  • Okay, the costumes throughout this are mostly fine, but Mary wears one outfit towards the end with a very high blouse that appears to tie at the neck and that just…does not seem correct for 1530s England. Mary and Anne also both wear heavy damask print dressing gowns in an early scene, right after Mary’s wedding night with William Carey, that look incredibly off to me.

  • Sadly, Anne really was convicted by her uncle and her former fiancée Henry Percy. The jury unanimously convicted Anne Boleyn.

  • George’s execution was a lot more dramatic in this film than it was in real life. Historically, he got a chance to speak to the crowd before his death, he wasn’t just carried off by a mob and killed by an executioner immediately.

  • Mary goes to plead for Anne’s life to Henry in the film, and he seems to agree to her pleas. However, this did not happen in real life. After Mary married William Stafford secretly and became pregnant, she was banished from court and disowned by her family. I don’t believe she ever saw anyone in her family after that – there’s no record of Mary visiting her parents or her siblings in the tower all, and definitely no record of her interacting with the king again.

  • Anne’s speech before her execution in the film is pretty close to what she said in real life.

  • Mary Boleyn ABSOLUTELY DID NOT TAKE PRINCESS ELIZABETH AWAY WITH HER. WTF. That would never in a million years happen. Elizabeth fortunately had red hair like her father and looked enough like him that it was never seriously questioned that she was his daughter.

My Obsessive Shakespeare English History Play Family Tree (from Richard II, Henry IVs, Henry V, Henry VIs, Richard III, AND NOW HENRY VIII))

Originally published October 21, 2019

Things I should have blogged about today: Six the Musical costumes (still working on it!), things I learned at the Emerging Writers Festival, the authors I met at the National Book Festival, TudorCon (just got back!), More #ShakespearesPlaylist

Things I actually worked on today: An overly detailed family tree of English monarchs involved in the Hundred Years’ War and the Cousins’ War (also known as the War of the Roses), as portrayed in various Shakespeare plays, including Richard II, Henry IV Part 1 and 2, Henry V, Henry VI Part 1, 2, and 3, and Richard III. This started as a way for me to sort out my own thoughts and for eventual distribution to the cast members of the Richard III production for which I’m stage managing, but it may have gotten a little too obsessive to be helpful at this point, lol.

Updated on 10/22 to add in the Woodvilles- while not royal, they are very important! I’m going to keep editing and working on this to make it more comprehensive and also to clear up some of the more obscured names on here.

I started with the wonderful family tree over at The History of England Podcast website (Thank you very much!) and modified it in a lot of ways, erasing some descendants that aren’t mentioned in the plays or super relevant, adding in others that are, etc. I also added in various notes to indicate “who killed whom” (or was ultimately responsible for the death) according to Shakespeare and “who had an affair with whom” (according to Shakespeare or historical fact or rumor). [NOTE: a lot of these deaths and affairs are not at all confirmed in history and I am in no way saying it actually happened that way, don’t at me.]

My conclusion is that everyone’s related (thus, the cousins’ war!), no one has ANY IMAGINATION WHATSOEVER when it comes to naming, and everyone killed everyone else’s relatives in some way.

Did I miss someone important? It’s totally possible! Half of these people have the same damn names!

Shakespeare has a whole bit in Richard III Act IV Scene 4 poking a little fun at that. I’ve put in notations to indicate which one is being talked about at which point because it is DAMN CONFUSING.

Queen Margaret. (speaking to Elizabeth Woodville)
Tell o'er your woes again by viewing mine:
I had an Edward (Edward, Prince of Wales [son of Henry VI and Margaret of Anjou]), till a Richard kill'd him; (Richard, Duke of Gloucester/Richard III)
I had a Harry (Henry VI), till a Richard kill'd him: (Gloucester/R 3)
Thou hadst an Edward (Edward V [son of Edward IV and Elizabeth Woodville]), till a Richard kill'd him; (Gloucester/R 3)
Thou hadst a Richard (Richard, Duke of York [son of Edward IV’s and Elizabeth Woodville), till a Richard killed him; (Gloucester/R 3)

Duchess of York. I had a Richard too, and thou didst kill him; (Richard, Duke of York [father of Edward IV, Clarence, and Gloucester/R 3; also Duchess of York’s late husband])
I had a Rutland too, thou holp'st to kill him.

Anyway, If I DID miss someone or got something wrong in this family tree, please let me know; it would be most appreciated!

UPDATED NOVEMBER 11, 2019

I added a few more generations and cleaned up a lot of the more illegible names. : ) This goes far beyond anything mentioned in Shakespeare’s history plays, but I wanted to add in all the relevant potential heirs under Elizabeth I.

I also reformatted and cleaned it up a lot. I printed out a big copy of this and mounted it on foam-board for demonstration purposes at Richard III rehearsal. I got to teach all about the wars of the roses and history and it was so much fun. :D Please feel free to download it and use it for your own purposes! But if you do so, please comment and let me know what you’re doing with it, I’d love to know!

If you’d like to download the family tree, you can do that here.